THE DICK ACT OF 1909 !! –
This is legit and not
a joke....
Wonder who in Washington is
supposed to keep up with all the laws that have been passed (and ignored)
throughout the years?
THE
BILL was passed back in 1902 and grants full rights to anyone who wants to own
as many guns as they can afford. Any movement to limit guns or magazines will
be in direct violation of this law. Pass it around.
THE
DICK ACT OF 1902! (BY CHARLES WILLIAM FREDERICK DICK) ARE YOU AWARE OF THIS
LAW?
DICK
ACT OF 1902 - CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) - PROTECTION AGAINST
TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT .
IT
WOULD APPEAR THAT THE ADMINISTRATION IS COUNTING ON THE FACT THAT THE AMERICAN
CITIZENS DON'T KNOW THIS, THEIR RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTION. DON'T PROVE THEM
RIGHT.
THE
DICK ACT OF 1902 ALSO KNOWN AS THE EFFICIENCY OF MILITIA BILL H.R.
11654 OF JUNE 28, 1902 and INVALIDATES ALL SO-CALLED GUN-CONTROL LAWS.
It
also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The three classes H.R. 11654
provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National
Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia; the unorganized militia;
and the regular army.
The
militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All
members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and
2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can
afford to buy.
The Dick Act of 1902
cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills
of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation
of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The
President of the United States has zero authority without violating the
Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State
borders.
The
National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for
limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union
; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for
which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
Get
this message out to all your email contacts. It's time to learn about your
rights.
(Thus
making all California ( Colorado & others) gun & magazine limiting laws
illegal !!!)
I'm
not so sure the current administration KNOWS, nor even cares, what the laws,
Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence say.
But
it doesn't matter to them anyway. He and his minions certainly don't have any
respect for them or us and will continue to do whatever they can get away with
to further their cause of gaining complete control.
Charles
William Frederick Dick (November 3, 1858 - March 13, 1945) was a Republican
politician from Ohio. He served in the United States House of Representatives
and U.S. Senate.
I was curious as to who was
the Dick in the DICK act of 1909 and found out little about him, but I found
out a little more about the Dick Act.
http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642
Attorney
General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the Organized Militia (the
National Guard) cannot be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of
the United States."
The Honorable William Gordon,
in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action
of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard)
to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt
Wilson ought to have been impeached.
During the war with England
an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to
draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory,
Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the
precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize
it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them
out of the country.
The fact is that the
President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men
from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA , and not even beyond
the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW
which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution
which they swore an oath to uphold.
Charles Hughes of the
American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix
to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which
states: "The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the
Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States ." In these
pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great
principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the
militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia
of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care
and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power
of Congress over it."
"This limitation upon
the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and
purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise
and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited
power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have
been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose.
Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had
been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens
and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon
the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some
restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use
of such power."
The Honorable William Gordon
Congressional Record, House, Page 640 -1917.
No comments:
Post a Comment