Thursday, October 4, 2012

Slow He Chips Away At Our Structure



Thought you might want to see this one if it hadn't passed your way, especially after I noticed the name/address all the way at the end.
  >
> *Those of you who are not military or retired military, please forward
> to as many as you know that are.
  
> Those of you that are retired military, please send this to your friends!!!
>
 
> The No. 1 issue that will defeat Obama
>
> Exclusive: Joseph Farah identifies BHO policy proposal GOP could exploit to
> victory
>
> There's an issue out there that can ensure Barack Obama is defeated in
> 2012.
> It's not Obamacare.
> It's not his religious views.
> It's not his commitment to socialist and anti-American causes.
> It's not even the birth certificate and his eligibility issues.
 
> I believe the issue that will take Obama down if Republicans make it an
> issue is his administration's proposed budget cuts for active-duty military
> personnel and military retirees - but not civilian defense workers.
> Do you get the picture?
 
> Obama has tipped his hand. He's showing the entire country what he thinks
> about our military service people - the people who risk their lives for
> their country are worth less than civilian defense workers who push papers
> around in Washington .
>
 
> Chances are you don't know much about this story. There's a good reason for
> that. The Big Media don't want you to know, because they recognize the
> political radioactivity it represents. This is the Death Star for Obama's
> re-election campaign. If Americans know about this - Republicans, Democrats
> and independents all oppose him.
>
> Here are the details of the story broken by the intrepid Bill Gertz: *
> *
> a.. "The Obama administration's proposed defense budget calls for military
> families and retirees to pay sharply more for their health care, while
> leaving unionized civilian defense worker' benefits untouched." *
> *b.. "Several congressional aides suggested the move is designed to
> increase the enrollment in Obamacare's state-run insurance exchanges." *
> *c.. "The disparity in treatment between civilians and uniformed personnel
> is causing a backlash within the military that could undermine recruitment
> and retention." *
> *d.. "Significantly, the plan calls for increases between 30 percent to 79
> percent in Tricare annual premiums for the first year. After that, the plan
> will impose five-year increases ranging from 94 percent to 345 percent -
> more than three times current levels."
 
> Think about this - and imagine how you would campaign against Obama on just
> this one issue.
>
> U.S. military service people don't get the equipment they need to do their
> jobs. They don't have the manpower they need to complete their missions.
> Their families scrimp and sacrifice financially so they can serve their
> country. They risk their lives and give their lives for their country.*
> *
> But, according to the Obama administration, unionized civilian defense
> workers, sitting behind their comfortable desks in Washington , deserve
> better treatment than our heroes serving overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan
> and elsewhere. *
> *It's almost unbelievable that Obama could serve up a slow-pitch softball
> like this for Republicans to knock out of the park.
> It's even more unbelievable that none of them has.
> Which is why I write this column. *
> *Obama needs to pay for this. Whether or not he backs off, whether or not
> Congress throws his budget out the window, whether or not these cuts are
> ever enacted, Obama needs to pay a big political price for showing his
> cards. Republicans need to remind Americans every day that Obama is the guy
> who wants to cut medical care for soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen -
> all while preserving the goodies for Washington bureaucrats.*
> *
> Men and women who put their lives on the line, who risked their health and
> well-being, are treated like second-class citizens in ObamaWorld. *
> *He signaled his absolute contempt for the U.S. military - not just the
> institution of the military, but the active-duty grunts on the front lines*
> *.
> This is an easy one for the American people to understand.
> So where are the Republicans?
> Where are the talk-show hosts?
> Where is the blogosphere chatter?*
> *
> Obama has stepped in something very smelly here. Why aren't more Obama
> critics making hay of it? Can you understand it?
>
> ALWAYS BARGAIN FROM A POSITION OF STRENGTH
>
> Obama and the Muslim brotherhood would like The United States to lose it's
> "position of strength" and its bargaining power!
>
> If we lose our military, we would lose our credibility in the world
> political arena.
>
> So, weaken our military and our credibility is weakened.
>
> Ben H. Willingham
> Association of Naval Aviation
> Bald Eagle Squadron
> P. O. Box 621
> Orange Park, FL 32067-0621 

*

One other thing is this adds more government employees thus liberal voters to fuel
the left wing agenda.   This election is so critical and half the voting public does not have a clue as to all that is going on and the other half, you and I only know but the tip of the iceberg,  I am not an alarmist but these are scary time for America.   He has hundreds of people working to bring our country down, running full speed with a leftest / social agenda.



We have to get out the vote and tell anyone who says they are voting for Ron Paul they are in fact voting for Obama and anyone who says they are not going to vote same thing.. a no vote is a vote for Obama.  So not be afraid to tell them.. This is shaping up to be a very close election in IL, OH, NY, FL and each of those are criticall to be elected Pres.   


HJ's comments

No comments: