What Happened To The Ohama's License of Law

Finally, something that makes sense regarding the relinquishing of bho’s license to practice law in 2008 AND which necessitated the huge cover-up of all of his background ‘records’.  Below are two little excerpts from a forum I found on line.

We all know that both he and michelle forfeited their ‘licenses’ to the State of Illinois.  She (in 1993, yea way back then) for having reportedly participated in INSURANCE fraud, and needing to do so to avoid prosecution by authorities.  He, in 2008 as he was running for president and was faced with having his “LICENSE” to practice Law REVOKED by the BAR ASSOCIATION of ILLINOIS as result of his LYING on his BAR APPLICATION after he left Harvard and applied to the Illinois Bar.  Note, the timing is 2008, this was DURING THE CAMPAIGN and what a revelation and blow to the campaign that would have been.

NOW the LIE on his ILLINOIS BAR APPLICATION is known.  It was a relatively simple thing but it is one which would cause revocation for simply telling of the lie.  However, the ramifications of the lie would have undone any possibility of his candidacy.  The application for the Bar of Illinois has a question, a simple line which asks;  “Have you ever been known by another name?”  Yep, you got it, Barrack Hussein Obama, a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, said, “No”.  That was the simple lie.  You see, there exist documents which shows Barry Soetoro, applied to Occidental, and to Columbia and used the name of Soetoro, not Obama.   He was given aid as a ‘foreign student’.  He, in fact, was then, and is now, an official resident and citizen of the country of Indonesia for he was legally adopted by Lelo Soetoro, his stepfather, in that country, way back then.  Here is the crux;  HE NEVER RENOUNCED THAT CITIZENSHIP AND NEVER LEGALLY CHANGED HIS NAME BACK TO BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.  He did use the name Soetoro, many times, at many different locations in the United States.  Hence, he is a fraud, a true fraud, and all because he told a small lie and did not bother to ever follow legal proscriptions.  (I guess he just thought the LAW did not apply to someone as notable as he.  Given his narcissism, that is entirely possible.)

Incidentally, the second paragraph (below) will tell you WHY the ‘EDITOR OF THE HARVARD LAW REVIEW’ did not work for a major law firm upon graduation.  Usually, upon graduation, the ‘Harvard Law Review’ Editor would have been hugely sought by law firms.  This does not mean he was not but, subsequent background investigations are necessitated.  He would have been rejected for large firms do very thorough background checks of their prospective attorneys as they must avoid any impropriety as they could be sued by any client who might discover something untoward by their member attorneys.  He would not have made the grade. 

Interesting, just interesting, what a liar sits in the W.H. but we all already knew that.  Amazing how one little lie just grows and grows as time goes by.