DIVORCE AGREEMENT FOR AMERICA

Since we are not going to get gasoline back to $1.50 per gallon and coffee to $2.00 per pound maybe this would be a solution we could live with. This is so incredibly well put, and I can hardly believe it's by a young person, a student!! Whatever he runs for, I'll vote for him!

DIVORCE AGREEMENT

Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, regressive, Marxists, and Obama supporters, et al:

We have stuck together since the late 1950s for the sake of the kids, but the  whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has clearly run its course.

Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever agree on what is right for us all, so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to irreconcilable differences and go our own way.

Here is a model separation agreement:

1. Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by land mass, each taking a similar portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy. Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides had such distinct and disparate tastes.

2. We don't like redistributive taxes, so you can keep them.

3. You are welcome to the  liberal judges and the ACLU.

4. Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA, and the military.

5. We'll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and you can go with wind, solar, and bio-diesel.

6. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore, and Rosie O'Donnell. You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move all three of them.

7. We'll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart, and Wall Street.

8. You can have your beloved lifelong welfare dwellers, food stamps, homeless homeboys, hippies, druggies, and illegal aliens.

9. We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEO's and rednecks.

10. We'll keep the Bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood ..

11. You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us.

12. You can have the peace-niks and war  protesters. When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we'll help provide them security.

13. We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values.

14. You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political correctness, and Shirley McLain. You can also have the U.N., but we will no longer be paying the bill.

15. We'll keep the SUV's, pickup trucks, and oversized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find.

16. You can give everyone healthcare if you can find any practicing doctors..

17. We'll continue to believe healthcare is an earned luxury and not a right. We will supply it for free only to those unable to earn it.

18. We'll keep "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" and "The National Anthem."

19. I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute "Imagine", "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing", "Kum Ba Ya," or "We Are the World".

20. We'll practice trickle down economics and you can continue to give trickle up poverty your best shot.

21. Since it often so offends you, we'll keep our history, our name and our constitution and our flag.

22. Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other like-minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll bet you answer which one of us will need whose help in 15 years.

Sincerely,

John J. Wall

Law Student and an American

P.S.: Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin Sheen, Barbara Streisand, and Jane Fonda with you.

P.S.S..: And you won't have to "Press 1 for English" when you call our country.

Forward this every time you get it! Let's keep this going; maybe some of it will start sinking in!

** If you can't stand behind our Military, Please feel free to stand in front  of them! **

Lincoln vs Obama

You might be quite surprised ....Most of us know of the comparable relationship between Lincoln and Kennedy, but have you ever considered the comparisons between  Obama and President Lincoln?

Parallels of Abraham Lincoln and Barack Hussein Obama.

1. Lincoln placed his hand on the Bible for his inauguration. Obama used the very same bible Lincoln used for his inauguration.

2. Lincoln came from Illinois. Obama comes from Illinois.

3. Lincoln served in the Illinois Legislature. Obama served in the Illinois Legislature.

4. Lincoln had very little experience before becoming President. Obama had very little experience before becoming President.

5. Lincoln rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration. Obama rode the train from Philadelphia to Washington for his inauguration.

6. Lincoln was highly respected by some, but intensely disliked by others.  Obama is highly respected by some, but intensely disliked by others.

7. Abraham Lincoln was a tall, skinny lawyer. Barack Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

8. Lincoln held to basic Conservative and Christian views. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

9. Lincoln volunteered in the Illinois militia, once as a captain, twice as a private. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

10. Lincoln firmly believed in able persons carrying their own weight.  Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

11. Lincoln was undeniably, and without any doubt, born in the United States.  Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

12. Lincoln was honest - so honest that he was called 'Honest Abe'. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

13. Lincoln preserved the United States as a strong nation, respected by the world. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

14. Lincoln showed his obvious respect for the flag, U. S. Constitution, and the military. Obama is a tall, skinny lawyer.

Amazing isn't it!!

The Story's Just Seem To Keep Comming and at taxpayers expense

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad owns all of the rail lines in the  US connecting to western  Canada . They haul 80%+ of the crude oil from Canada to the Midwest and Texas, or charge other short line railroads a fee to use BNSF tracks.

BNSF charges $30 per barrel to haul the oil.  The proposed "Keystone pipeline" would cost $10 per barrel according to the US State Department's own estimates and perhaps a lower amount as reflected in other estimates.

BNSF is owned by Berkshire-Hathaway whose chairman is Warren Buffett.   In the last 2 election cycles, Buffett gave extensively to Democrat causes and candidates, particularly Obama in 2012.  He also bundled and hosted numerous fundraisers for Obama.  If anyone believes the pipeline isn't being blocked by Obama on Buffett's behalf, you need to seek immediate medication.  

On this basis, Buffett could stand to lose $2 Billion a year if the Keystone pipeline goes in and he makes the same amount every year it's delayed. Is this "crony capitalism" at its finest or what?

Facts That Pretty Much Says It All

Two Americas - Bob Lonsberry nails it

The Democrats are right, there  are two Americas. The America that works, and the America that doesn’t.  The America that contributes, and the America that doesn’t. It’s not the  haves and the have not's, it’s the dos and the don'ts. Some people do  their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to  society, and others don't.  That’s the divide in America.  It’s  not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility. It’s about  a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order  to win elective office.   It’s about a political party that  loves power more than it loves its country.  That’s not invective,  that’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it.

The politics of  envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when President Obama pledged  the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.”  He noted that  some people make more than other people, that some people have higher  incomes than others, and he says that’s not just.  That is the  rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take  it for you. Vote Democrat. That is the philosophy that produced  Detroit.  It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying  America.  It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values  and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support  it, but a betrayal.  The Democrats have not empowered their  followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and  entitlement, of victim-hood and anger instead of ability and hope. The  president’ premise –that you reduce income inequality by debasing the  successful –seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices  and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.   Because, by and large, income variations in society is a result of  different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose  wisely and responsibility have a far greater likelihood of success, while  those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood  of failure  Success and failure usually manifest themselves in  personal and family income.  You choose to drop out of high school or  to skip college – and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone  who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your  children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course; you have them  within a marriage and life is apt to take another course. Most often in  life our destination is determined by the course we take. 

My  doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income  inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but,  our lives also have had an in equality of effort.  While my doctor  went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and  residency, I got a job in a restaurant.  He made a choice, I made a  choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes.  His outcome  pays a lot better than mine. Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama  needs to take away his wealth?  No, it means we are both free men in  a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.    It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The  freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for  success if there is no true option for failure. The pursuit of happiness  means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if  your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy.    Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing.  Even if the  other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and short sighted  decisions.

Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of  outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort. The  simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes  applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get."  Obama would  turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of  society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society.  Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American  society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator  society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to  foster equality through mediocrity. He and his party speak of two  Americas, and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to  sap the productivity of the other.  America is not divided by the  differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our  efforts.

It is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes  about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization. What Obama  offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and  strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political  benefit.  That’s what socialists offer.  Marxist class warfare  wrapped up with a bow. Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the  truth to Lincoln’s maxim that a house divided against itself cannot  stand.   "Life is ten percent what happens to you and ninety  percent how you respond to it."

Bob Lonsberry

Things Have Gone From Bad To Worse for Our Fighting Men and Women

Veterans Backlash Against Obama

God Bless America.

I hope anyone who has military background, or even if you haven't, will forward this. If you are not a veteran send this to those that you know who are, or to those who may know veterans.

(The 2014 United States elections will be held on Tuesday, November 4, 2014. During this midterm election year, all 435 seats in the United States House of Representatives and 33 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate will be contested in this election. Get out and VOTE!)

A movement has been started by our armed forces to get out the vote in 2014. They are organizing themselves, but this can be done by all of us. The President, the Commander in Chief, has made the Rules of Engagement (ROE) so difficult, that our troops are often killed before they can even get permission to fight. Nothing has been done to stop our troops from being murdered by the Afghanis they are training, either. Now, the President wants the US to sign on to the UN's International Criminal Court (ICC), which would allow the UN's ICC to arrest and try US troops for War Crimes, without the legal protections guaranteed under US Law, and from which there is no appeal. The President, with his Democratic control of the Senate, has nearly all the power. If the Non-Establishment Republicans, and Conservatives, can take back the Senate in 2014, our troops can once again be protected from unnecessary danger. Please consider this, and send it on to your mailing lists. Thank You.

Interestingly enough, when GWB was president you heard about the military deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan almost daily. With Obama in the White House, the mainstream media has been strangely quiet. --- More than 1,000 American soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan in the last 27 months. This is more than the combined total of the nine years before. Thirty have died in August. During the last month, over 50 additional NATO and US servicemen have been murdered, inside jobs by those who are hired to be a force for good in Afghanistan .

The commander in chief is AWOL. Not a peep, although he ordered the White House flag flown at half-staff for the Sikhs that were killed on August 5, 2012.

There is a deep disgust, a fury, growing in the ranks of the military against the indifferent incompetence of this president.

It has taken on a dangerous tone. No one knows what to do about him, but the anger runs deep as the deaths continue with no strategic end in sight to the idiocy of this war. Obama has had 4 years to end this futile insanity, during which time he has vacationed, golfed, campaigned, and generally ignored the plight of our men and women in uniform. But, there is now a movement afoot in the armed services to launch a massive get out the vote drive against this president.

Not just current active duty types, but the National Guard, Reserves, the retired, and all other prior service members. This is no small special interest group, but many millions of veterans who can have an enormous impact on the outcome of the November election if they all respond.

The one million military retirees in Florida alone could mean an overwhelming victory in that state if they all show up at the polls. It might not keep another one hundred U.S. troops from dying between now and November, but a turn out to vote by the military against this heart breaking lack of leadership can make a powerful statement that hastens a change to the indifference of this shallow little man who just lets our soldiers die.

Please forward to your lists. High Priority!