The New Normal: "Why work hard for $60,000,
when you can earn $14,000 and sit around collecting another $50,000!"
I
realize that welfare benefits, Medicare, and cutting the spending side of the
fiscal cliff - are all painful topics to discuss. Thanks to James T. - if
you somehow believed that it was the top 1% that is stealing from the middle
class, please realize that it is also those individuals at the bottom of the
economic ladder that rip off the middle class - courtesy of the world's most
generous entitlement system. It's horrific when you can do as well
working one week a month at minimum wage as you can working a $60,000/year,
fulltime, high stress job. This chart tells the story, and is fairly
self-explanatory:
Money
Earned in a Year $3,625 $14,500
$30,000 $60,000
+Payroll and Fed Inc. Tax (
278) (
1,225) ( 4,574)
( 13,034)
+Childcare Cost
( 2,400) (
9,600) ( 9,600)
( 9,600)
+Mississippi Inc. Tax
( 109)
( 725)
( 1,500) ( 3,000)
+Earned Inc. Tax Credit
1,450
5,020 2,163
0
+Food Stamps
6,312
6,312
0 0
+National School Lunche
1,800
1,800
0
0
+Temp. Assistance(TANF) 2,040
0
0
0
+Medicaid and CHIP 16,500
16,500
10,890
0
+Section 8 Rent Subsidy 1,450
4,350
0
0
+Utility Bill Assist (LIHEAP) 1,240
845
0
0
Total
Disposable Inc. $31,630
$37,777
$26,379 $34,366
This
chart shows that a one-parent family of three making $14,500 a year (minimum
wage) has more disposable income than a family making $60,000 a year.
Then I realized that a family provider working only one week a month at minimum
wage, makes 92% of that same $60,000 a year - ugh!
Did
you ever wonder why Obama was so focused on health reform? It is so that
those who have no interest or ability in working can make as much as
representatives of America's endangered, middle class.
-
First, working one week a month, saves a lot on childcare.
-
Second, by only working one week a month you have minimal deductibles and
copays - so you virtually get total medical coverage for next to nothing.
-
Third, the low-income parent will have more energy to attend to the various
stresses of managing a household.
-
Fourth, say that one-week-a-month worker maintains an unreported cash-only job
on the side - then the deal gets even better than the $60k a year job.
And some economists estimate that there is $1 Trillion in unreported, earned
income each year in the United States.
Now
where it gets plainly out of control is if one throws in Supplemental Security
Income (SSI). SSI pays $8,088/period for each "disabled" family
member. A person can be deemed "disabled" if they are totally
lacking in the cultural and educational skills needed to be employable in the
workforce. If you add $24,262 a year (for three disability checks), now
the lowest paid welfare family would again have far more take-home pay than the
$60,000 a year family.
The
topic of wealth redistribution in America is truly a touchy subject. But
this chart matches the disposable income chart recently released by the
Congressional Budget Office - who just released a key paper titled: "Share
of Returns Filed by Low- and Moderate-Income Workers, by Marginal Tax Rate,
Under 2012 Law".
Perhaps
the most disturbing set of figures resides below, and tries to summarize our
unsustainable welfare burden:
-
For every 1.65 people employed in the private sector, 1 person receives welfare
assistance, and
- For every
1.25 people employed in the private sector, 1 person receives welfare
assistance or works for the government.
Currently
there are 110 million privately employed workers, and there are 88 million
welfare recipients and government workers - rising rapidly.
As
much as everyone keeps throwing stones at the top of our social order, the
facts show us that individuals at the bottom of the entitlement food chain also
make out like a bandits. On our path to socialistic welfare - we've long
surpassed capitalistic/communist China - because in capitalist/communist China
you actually need to work to eat.
No comments:
Post a Comment